- Dates
- 2014-07-09 – 2014-08-29
- Kind
- Public_discussion
- Where
- Beaver Island
- Eras
- Modern era
- Concepts
- governancetaxesaccountingopen-governmentcommunity
- Within
- Beaver Island
Summary
From July through August 2014, a forum thread questioned the history, authorization, and accounting of a one-percent property-tax administrative fee. The discussion included a reported records request and participant-reported figures attributed to county and township responses.
Evidence limits
The forum establishes that the issue was publicly disputed and that records were sought. It does not establish that the fee was unlawful, that the reported amounts are accurate, or that money was missing. Official resolutions, tax records, and treasurer or court records should control those questions.
Sources
See the sources block above.
Sources
- A participant questioned the approval history and accounting of a one-percent property-tax administrative fee, described a FOIA inquiry, and reported figures attributed to the county treasurer and a St. James response. The amounts, records, and legal conclusions remain participant-reported here and require official resolutions, treasurer records, or court findings for verification.forum · www.beaverislandforum.com · 07 · t007672
Added 8 August 2026. Recent changes
Cite this article
Beaver Island Archive, “Beaver Island property-tax administrative fee becomes subject of public dispute, 2014”, https://beaverislandarchive.org/events/beaver-island-property-tax-administrative-fee-dispute-2014/, accessed [date], citing Beaver Island Forum, “Beaver Island Taxpayer's unfair and unvoted tax,” July 9–August 29, 2014..
Last revised 2026-08-08. Fill in [date] with the date you read it — this page is static and cannot know that.
BibTeX for “Beaver Island property-tax administrative fee becomes subject of public dispute, 2014”RIS for “Beaver Island property-tax administrative fee becomes subject of public dispute, 2014”